Check report for Carapelli from 1 April 2026
How AI models see “Carapelli” — report: 6 models, 8 scenarios each · 1 April 2026 · niche: Premium Olive Oil · Global
Dynamics across runs
13 weekly measurements over ~3 months
Red line: GPI™ by measurement. Gray line: share of voice.
GPI™ climbed from 11 to 31 and share of voice from 4% to 18%—steady visibility gains in AI answers.
GPI™
Share of voice %
18
GPI™ · 1 Apr 2026
Critical (0–34)
Vs previous run
29 +2 pts
Leader — Bertolli
78−60 pts
90-day target (guide)
18 → 35–45
Niche · date
Premium Olive Oil · Global · 1 Apr
GPI™ scale (0–100)
You: 18
Leader (Bertolli): 78
AI visibility
18%
Models that named your brand. Competitor rows use a different metric (name share in answer text).
Avg list position
4.2
Average slot in recommendation lists (1 ≈ first).
Site as AI source
1%
Share of links to your site among sources in answers.
How AI talks about you
40% · 24% · 36%
Positive · neutral · negative on labeled answers.
Action plan
0 of 5 doneGPI™ 18 → 35–45 · 90d guide
P1
Coverage & competitors
4 of 6 models mentioned Carapelli at least once. Still silent this run: ChatGPT, Perplexity. Among answers that name competitors, Bertolli shows up about once every 3—that name is easy for models to recall. Create a “Carapelli vs Bertolli” page with an honest side-by-side. In a niche like “Premium Olive Oil · Global”, spell out price, timelines, materials, or whatever buyers compare head-to-head. Models often cite pages like this for “what should I pick” questions. Prioritize intents where visibility lags: «Best olive oils for everyday cooking»; «Premium olive oil comparison»; «Blind tasting» — add or refresh landing sections that answer those prompts directly. Weakest model rows: ChatGPT 0/8 prompts with a mention; Perplexity 0/8 prompts with a mention. Task: rerun after you add niche facts, lists, and citations those models tend to use.
+8–14 pts
P2
Website citations
Citation share is modest (~0.8% of hosts in this run). Improve structured summaries on key pages and add one or two external links worth citing. Pitch mentions on domains models already cite in this run: wikipedia.org, oliveoiltimes.com, bonappetit.com, ratingruneta.ru.
+5–10 pts
P1
List position
Average list position 4.2 (among answers where the model assigned a list slot) — Carapelli is often placed in the bottom half of lists, not first. Publish a flagship page titled “Premium Olive Oil · Global — Carapelli” with comparisons, proof (specs, reviews, awards), and the same 5–7 concrete facts so models have reasons to move you up.
+8–14 pts
P1
Sentiment
Labeled tone: ~40% pos / ~24% neu / ~36% neg. Task: rewrite FAQs and public specs around the recurring negatives—only where you have proof.
+8–14 pts
P2
Site & next steps
Site clarity: improve “Structured data (schema)” — one consistent company/product story on key pages so assistants repeat the same facts you publish.
+5–10 pts
Context:Carapelli · GPI™ 18vs BertolliPremium Olive Oil · Globalwikipedia.org
Assistant
Hi — I already know this report’s metrics. Check off a task in the plan or ask below.
Detailed analysis
Key takeaways
Carapelli · GPI™ 18/100
Critical · Coverage & competitors
4 of 6 models mention you — grow the rest. “Bertolli” leads competitor mentions in answers.
4 of 6 models mentioned Carapelli at least once. Still silent this run: ChatGPT, Perplexity. Among answers that name competitors, Bertolli shows up about once every 3—that name is easy for models to recall. Create a “Carapelli vs Bertolli” page with an honest side-by-side. In a niche like “Premium Olive Oil · Global”, spell out price, timelines, materials, or whatever buyers compare head-to-head. Models often cite pages like this for “what should I pick” questions. Prioritize intents where visibility lags: «Best olive oils for everyday cooking»; «Premium olive oil comparison»; «Blind tasting» — add or refresh landing sections that answer those prompts directly. Weakest model rows: ChatGPT 0/8 prompts with a mention; Perplexity 0/8 prompts with a mention. Task: rerun after you add niche facts, lists, and citations those models tend to use.
At risk · Website citations
Your site is almost never cited by models.
Citation share is modest (~0.8% of hosts in this run). Improve structured summaries on key pages and add one or two external links worth citing. Pitch mentions on domains models already cite in this run: wikipedia.org, oliveoiltimes.com, bonappetit.com, ratingruneta.ru.
Critical · List position
Avg position 4.2 — often low in recommendation lists.
Average list position 4.2 (among answers where the model assigned a list slot) — Carapelli is often placed in the bottom half of lists, not first. Publish a flagship page titled “Premium Olive Oil · Global — Carapelli” with comparisons, proof (specs, reviews, awards), and the same 5–7 concrete facts so models have reasons to move you up.
Critical · Sentiment
Notable negative tone — fix recurring issues you can prove.
Labeled tone: ~40% pos / ~24% neu / ~36% neg. Task: rewrite FAQs and public specs around the recurring negatives—only where you have proof.
Deep dive — pick a section
Site & next steps
Site clarity: improve “Structured data (schema)” — one consistent company/product story on key pages so assistants repeat the same facts you publish.
Visibility by model
Models that named your brand. Competitor rows use a different metric (name share
Claude👁
100%
8/8 prompts
DeepSeek👁
100%
7/7 prompts
Gemini👁
100%
8/8 prompts
Grok👁
100%
8/8 prompts
ChatGPT🚫
0%
0/8 prompts
Perplexity🚫
0%
0/8 prompts
GPI™ among competitors
Bertolli
78
Filippo Berio
67
Kirkland (Costco)
51
Colavita
44
Carapelli ← you
18
Strong (60+)At risk (35–59)Critical (0–34)
Quotes
Showing 7 of 7 matching filters (8 total in report) · Competitors highlighted · negative hidden by default
GPT
ChatGPT· PositiveBest olive oils for everyday cooking…
Carapelli is a familiar Italian label with consistent extra virgin quality.
GPT
ChatGPT· NeutralPremium olive oil comparison…
In the premium tier, Bertolli, Filippo Berio, and Carapelli are often cited—each with a distinct flavor profile.
CL
Claude· PositiveMild extra virgin oils without harsh bitterness…
Carapelli works well for buyers who want a mellow, fruit-forward oil without aggressive bitterness.
GM
Gemini· NeutralEthics and provenance…
Check origin certificates: Carapelli and Colavita both tend to show transparent supply chains.
PER
Perplexity· NeutralPrice-to-quality ranking…
Carapelli sits in the mid-premium band; the widest AI answer coverage still skews toward the largest global brands.
DS
DeepSeek· PositiveBest oils for salads…
For light salads, Carapelli extra virgin is often recommended thanks to balanced acidity.
GPT
ChatGPT· PositiveBlind tasting…
In blind tastings, Carapelli frequently lands in the top three among mass-market premium oils.
Citation sources
top domains · 23
1.
wikipedia.org
14% · 26
2.
oliveoiltimes.com
11% · 19
3.
bonappetit.com
9% · 16
4.
ratingruneta.ru
8% · 12
5.
ashmanov.com
7% · 10
6.
serpstat.com
6% · 9
7.
bbcgoodfood.com
5.5% · 8
8.
searchengines.guru
5% · 7
9.
2gis.ru
4% · 6
10.
yandex.ru
4% · 6
11.
foodandwine.com
3.5% · 5
12.
reddit.com
3.2% · 5
13.
bertolli.com
3% · 11
14.
healthline.com
2.6% · 4
GPI™ among competitors
Bertolli
78
Filippo Berio
67
Kirkland (Costco)
51
Colavita
44
Carapelli ← you
18
Strong (60+)At risk (35–59)Critical (0–34)
Want this every week — on autopilot?
Re-run on a schedule, watch competitors, and get alerts when something moves.
GPI™ chart (1y)All competitorsNew-player alertsScheduled runsAll quotes & sources
View plans →
Cancel anytime.
GPI™ = coverage 35% · citation 30% · position 20% · sentiment 15% (renormalized if a field is missing).
Scores reflect this check run; competitor rows use visibility or mention share where GPI is not stored per brand.