Skip to content

AI brand monitoring

See how your brand is recommended in ChatGPT, YandexGPT, and GigaChat

Buyer journeys increasingly start in AI assistants. If your brand is absent from category shortlists, demand goes elsewhere before users ever open a SERP.

What a finished report looks like

The sample report highlights executive-ready blocks: metrics, reliability context, change summary, and next actions.

Sample report (demo data)

Carapelli

Premium Olive Oil · Global · Completed 1 Apr 2026, 12:00

Open full demo
31
LLM-Score
18%
Share of voice
4.2
Avg. list position

Mentions by model (demo run)

Highlight: — — the focus of this landing page. Numbers are illustrative.

ChatGPT0%
Claude100%
Gemini100%
Perplexity0%
Grok100%
DeepSeek100%
n/a
ChatGPT
«Best olive oils for everyday cooking»
Carapelli is a familiar Italian label with consistent extra virgin quality.
ChatGPT
«Premium olive oil comparison»
In the premium tier, Bertolli, Filippo Berio, and Carapelli are often cited—each with a distinct flavor profile.

Competitors in this slice

BertolliFilippo BerioKirkland (Costco)Colavita+ more in the full report

Your real report uses the same layout: scores, per-model breakdown, quotes, competitors, and citations — with your brand and the models you select.

Benchmarking

Timestamped snapshot

Completion time is stored with every run—clean before/after comparisons when you change positioning or content.

Method

Organic-style prompts

Your brand name is not pasted into the question text; we score whether models still mention you in realistic category queries.

Context

Around AI visibility

Add sibling models in the same check to see if the pattern is specific to AI visibility or repeats across the stack.

About this model

Model behavior diverges by platform, language, and prompt intent; one manual chat thread is never enough for decision-grade reporting.

Periodic snapshots let teams connect content, PR, and product changes to measurable shifts in AI visibility.

How we measure visibility

Getllmspy runs fixed scenario packs without inserting your brand name into prompt text and returns one standardized report.

  • Parallel checks across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, YandexGPT, GigaChat, and more
  • LLM-Score, share of voice, sentiment, competitors, and answer quotes
  • Trend tracking and change summary since the previous issue

Inside the report

Snapshot header

Completion time and which models ran—your anchor for before/after benchmarking.

LLM-Score & share of voice

Aggregated 0–100 signal plus the share of models that mentioned your brand at least once.

Competitors & roundups

Who appears next to you in ChatGPT answers: names, frequency, comparison or recommendation context.

Quotes & wording

Answer excerpts for manual review—how the model talks about the category and your brand.

Same prompts on other models

Parallel runs (Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, …) to see if the pattern is ChatGPT-specific.

From check to PDF-ready snapshot

Brand & niche

You set brand context, site, category, language, and check type—this selects the prompt pack.

Model mix

Pick the LLM families to include; the same scenarios run in parallel across all of them.

Server run

The job executes on our side; you can close the tab and open the report from History when ready.

Report

LLM-Score, share of voice, competitors, quotes, citations—exportable and rerunnable on demand.

Without regular monitoring, brands can silently disappear from AI recommendations long before teams notice.

FAQ